Case 2304395/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Wood v 1) Hexis Recruitment Services 2) Light As Feather Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304395/2022
- Decision date
- 18 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Wood
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the tribunal dealt with an unauthorised deduction from wages claim brought by Ms G Wood against Hexis Recruitment Services and Light As Feather Limited. The judgment records that the second respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
The tribunal ordered the second respondent to pay Ms Wood the gross sum of £201.83. No separate breakdown of remedy components is given in the extracted text, and the judgment does not record any award against the first respondent.
The judgment is short and does not set out any additional findings, legal tests, or reasons beyond the conclusion that the wage deduction was unauthorised and the resulting monetary order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the second respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and was ordered to pay the gross sum stated. | Upheld | — | £202 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £202
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.