Case 2304396/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A. Coimbra (1) Miss G. Zedda (2) v Shapers (Sutton) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304396/2022
- Decision date
- 14 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R. Smith
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A. Coimbra (1) Miss G. Zedda (2)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was determined under rule 47 in the absence of the respondent and of the second claimant, with the first claimant appearing in person before Employment Judge T.R. Smith at London South via CVP on 14 December 2023. The tribunal found in favour of the first claimant on each of the complaints addressed in the judgment.
The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages for the period 26 August 2022 to 15 September 2022 was well-founded, and the respondent was ordered to pay £1,048.80 gross. The complaint of breach of contract in respect of notice pay was well-founded, with damages of £3,283.20 calculated on gross pay to reflect Post Employment Notice Pay. The holiday pay complaint was also well-founded, the respondent having failed to pay accrued but untaken holiday on termination, with £527.13 ordered. Under section 163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 the first claimant was determined to be entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £3,283.20.
The text provided records determinations only in respect of the first claimant; it does not set out any findings or remedies in respect of the second claimant, Miss G. Zedda, who did not attend.
Claims and outcomes
10 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from the first claimant's wages in the period 26 August 2022 to 15 September 2022. Gross sum; claimant responsible for tax/NI. | Upheld | — | £1,049 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded to the first claimant as damages for breach of contract, calculated on gross pay to reflect Post Employment Notice Pay tax treatment. | Upheld | — | £3,283 |
| Holiday pay | Unauthorised deduction by failing to pay the first claimant for holidays accrued but not taken at the date employment ended. Claimant responsible for tax/NI. | Upheld | — | £527 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment determined under s.163 Employment Rights Act 1996, payable to the first claimant. | Upheld | — | £3,283 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from the first claimant's wages in the period 26 August 2022 to 15 September 2022. Gross sum; claimant responsible for tax/NI. | Upheld | — | £1,049 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded to the first claimant as damages for breach of contract, calculated on gross pay to reflect Post Employment Notice Pay tax treatment. | Upheld |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,142
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 47
- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.