Case 2304411/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Pridmore v Buy Right Windows Doors & Conservatories Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2304411/2018
- Decision date
- 25 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Pridmore
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis Rule 21 judgment records that Mr R Pridmore’s complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages / breach of contract succeeded against Buy Right Windows Doors & Conservatories Limited. The tribunal did not set out additional factual findings or legal analysis in the extracted text provided.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £4,487.45. No separate breakdown of the award between the wages and breach of contract aspects is given in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant’s complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages / breach of contract succeeds and orders payment of a single gross sum of £4,487.45, without splitting the award between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant’s complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages / breach of contract succeeds and orders payment of a single gross sum of £4,487.45, without splitting the award between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,487
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.