Case 2304411/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mr B Dunster and Mr M Simson (Directors) (RNR) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304411/2019
- Decision date
- 19 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that no response had been submitted by the Respondents within the applicable time limit and that there had been no application to extend time. On that basis, it held that the claims of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages were well founded and succeeded.
The Second Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant £10,195.82. That sum was made up of notice pay of £4,842.00, unpaid wages of £4,853.82, comprising £2,553.82 and £2,300.00, and £500.00 for loss of statutory rights.
The tribunal stated that no other losses were claimed apart from expenses it considered too remote. It also recorded that no basic award was made because the Claimant had received a redundancy payment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim succeeded because the Respondents did not submit a response within the applicable time limit and did not apply to extend time. The judgment did not apportion the monetary award between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The claim succeeded because the Respondents did not submit a response within the applicable time limit and did not apply to extend time. The judgment did not apportion the monetary award between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim succeeded because the Respondents did not submit a response within the applicable time limit and did not apply to extend time. The judgment did not apportion the monetary award between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,196
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.