Case 2304418/2018 · Employment Tribunal

In person (assisted by her partner, Mr Williams Smith) For the v Respondent — 2021

Case reference: 2304418/2018
Decision date: 14 May 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Hyams-Parish Members
Venue: London South
Panel members: Mr R Shaw, Ms J Saunders

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In person (assisted by her partner, Mr Williams Smith) For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Employment Tribunal, sitting at London South on 11 to 14 May 2021 before Employment Judge Hyams-Parish with members Mr R Shaw and Ms J Saunders, gave a unanimous judgment in favour of the claimant, Ms J Bravo. The written record states that the claim of constructive unfair dismissal was well founded and succeeded, and that the claim of disability discrimination was also well founded and succeeded.

The written record does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasons or any monetary remedy. It records that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Constructive dismissal	The judgment states that the claim of constructive unfair dismissal is well founded and succeeds.	Upheld	—	—
Disability discrimination	The judgment states that the claim of disability discrimination is well founded and succeeds.	Upheld	Disability	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.