Case 2304422/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr JA Artieda Villacres v Kingdom Services Group Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304422/2019
- Decision date
- 26 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr JA Artieda Villacres
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
The respondent was ordered to pay £1190.45 for the unlawful deduction and £297.61 as a 25% uplift because of its unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS code of practice on Disciplinary and Grievance procedures. The total sum ordered was £1488.06, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance as appropriate.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award comprised £1190.45 for the unlawful deduction and a £297.61 uplift for unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS code of practice on Disciplinary and Grievance procedures. | Upheld | — | £1,488 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,488
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
- ACAS code of practice Disciplinary and Grievance procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.