Case 2304422/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Domingues Ferrao v L’Impeccable Services Solutions Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2304422/2023
- Decision date
- 17 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Domingues Ferrao
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 17 January 2024 at London South (Croydon) by CVP, Employment Judge Wright heard the claimant, Mrs S Domingues Ferrao, appearing in person against L’Impeccable Services Solutions Ltd, represented by Mr A Abbas, paralegal. The tribunal gave judgment orally at the hearing.
The tribunal found that the claimant’s claims for unauthorised deductions from wages, notice pay and a redundancy payment were well-founded and succeeded. It awarded gross sums of £931.60 for unauthorised deductions, £2,192.00 for notice pay, and £2,877 for redundancy pay.
The total gross award was £6,000.60, and the claimant was directed to account to HMRC. Written reasons were not provided in the judgment record unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded and awarded £931.60 gross. | Upheld | — | £932 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the notice pay claim was well-founded and awarded £2,192.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,192 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the redundancy payment claim was well-founded and awarded £2,877 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,877 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,001
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.