Case 2304423/2023 · Employment Tribunal
E Crawley v Power Electric Services Limited (in Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304423/2023
- Decision date
- 14 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burge Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E Crawley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages failed and was dismissed. The written judgment is short and records the outcome after oral reasons were given at the hearing, rather than setting out a fuller factual narrative.
The claimant's claims of sex discrimination and maternity and pregnancy discrimination succeeded. The tribunal stated that the respondent directly discriminated against the claimant.
The tribunal awarded financial losses of £5,062.89, interest on those losses of £749.03, injury to feelings of £10,000, and interest on injury to feelings of £1,593.42. The total award recorded in the judgment was £17,405.34.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The claim succeeded; the tribunal found that the respondent directly discriminated against the claimant. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The claim succeeded; the tribunal found that the respondent directly discriminated against the claimant. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,405
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £5,063
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.