Case 2304472/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Tyrell v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304472/2023
- Decision date
- 20 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hart
- Panel members
- Ms Thompson, Ms Whitlam
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Tyrell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal unanimously dismissed the complaints of direct disability discrimination. It also dismissed the complaint that the first written warning issued on 9 March 2023, backdated to December 2022, was unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability.
The Tribunal upheld the complaint that the final written warning issued on 19 October 2023 was unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability. The complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability were dismissed.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment records outcomes only and does not set out the detailed factual findings, reasoning, or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The complaints of direct disability discrimination were found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint that the first written warning issued on 9 March 2023, backdated to December 2022, was unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint that the final written warning issued on 19 October 2023 was unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability was found well-founded and succeeded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability were found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.