Mr E Nestor v Gloster MEP Limited — 2021

Case reference: 2304479/2019
Decision date: 8 January 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge L Burge Representation
Venue: London South

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr E Nestor

Respondent

Gloster MEP Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal found that Mr E Nestor’s claim of unfair dismissal against Gloster MEP Ltd was well founded and succeeded. The hearing was held at London South by CVP on 7 and 8 January 2021 before Employment Judge L Burge.

The tribunal awarded a compensatory award of £3,642.07. It also recorded that, because the claimant had received a statutory redundancy payment, his entitlement to a basic award was extinguished.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim well founded. It awarded a compensatory award of £3,642.07 and recorded that, because the claimant had received a statutory redundancy payment, entitlement to a basic award was extinguished.	Upheld	—	£3,642

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £3,642; across all upheld claims
Basic award: £0; statutory, unfair dismissal
Compensatory award: £3,642; compensatory remedy recorded

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.