Case 2304479/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Nestor v Gloster MEP Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2304479/2019
- Decision date
- 8 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Burge Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Nestor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr E Nestor’s claim of unfair dismissal against Gloster MEP Ltd was well founded and succeeded. The hearing was held at London South by CVP on 7 and 8 January 2021 before Employment Judge L Burge.
The tribunal awarded a compensatory award of £3,642.07. It also recorded that, because the claimant had received a statutory redundancy payment, his entitlement to a basic award was extinguished.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim well founded. It awarded a compensatory award of £3,642.07 and recorded that, because the claimant had received a statutory redundancy payment, entitlement to a basic award was extinguished. | Upheld | — | £3,642 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,642
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £3,642
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.