Mr S M Gurung v Ghulam Mustafa — 2021

Case reference: 2304513/2019
Decision date: 7 July 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Braganza Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr S M Gurung

Respondent

Ghulam Mustafa

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Braganza dated 07 July 2021. The tribunal recorded that the claim for unfair dismissal, breach of contract and unauthorized deduction from wages succeeds.

The judgment does not set out the underlying factual findings in the extracted text. It states only that remedy was not determined at this stage and would be dealt with at a Remedy Hearing to be listed for one hour.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The rule 21 judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing.	Upheld	—	—
Breach of contract	The rule 21 judgment states that the breach of contract claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing.	Upheld	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment refers to 'unauthorized deduction from wages'; this is recorded here as unlawful deduction from wages. Remedy was not fixed in this decision.	Upheld	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.