Case 2304518/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Royal Borough of Greenwich — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304518/2018
- Decision date
- 15 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cheetham QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered the Respondent's application to strike out the claim on the ground that it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing. The claim had been presented in December 2018 and concerned events between March and July 2018, with significant factual disputes including an incident on 25 July 2018.
The tribunal noted that three final hearings had been postponed, primarily because of the Claimant's ill health and hospitalisation, and that there was no clear medical prognosis showing when the Claimant would be able to participate in a hearing. The tribunal also took into account the passage of time, the likely need for further case management because the issues had not been finalised, the impact of the proceedings on the Respondent's witnesses, and proportionality in light of the stated claim value of £11,234 and the costs to the Respondent.
The tribunal concluded that, particularly because of the amount of time that had elapsed and the risk of further delay, a fair trial was no longer possible. The claim was therefore struck out under Rule 37(1)(e), with the tribunal stating that this involved no criticism of the Claimant or his father.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment strikes out the claim under Rule 37(1)(e) but does not set out the pleaded discrimination allegations in detail; disability classification follows the supplied listing/category context. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- Rule 37(1)(e)
- Overriding Objective
- Article 6.1 ECHR
- Riley v Crown Prosecution Service [2013] EWCA Civ 951
- Peixoto v British Telecommunications plc UKEAT/0222/07
- Osonnaya v South West Essex Primary Care Trust UKEAT/0629/11
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.