Case 2304523/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Cenzig Halil v Westex Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304523/2019
- Decision date
- 28 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Cenzig Halil
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Cenzig Halil was employed by Westex Ltd as a Print Manager from 1 June 2015 until 19 September 2019, when he was made redundant. The respondent did not enter a defence and had gone into administration, so judgment was entered under Rule 21 on the basis of the claimant's information and documents.
The tribunal found that on 19 September 2019 all 125 staff were called into a boardroom and given letters stating that they were redundant with immediate effect and had one hour to leave. There was no recognised trade union and no worker representatives had been appointed for consultation. The tribunal declared that the respondent had failed to comply with s.188 TULRA 1992 and ordered remuneration under s.189(4) TULRA 1992 for the 90-day period from 19 September 2019 to all employees made redundant on that date.
On the contractual notice claim, the tribunal found that the claimant's terms entitled him to three months' notice and did not contain an express payment-in-lieu-of-notice clause. It accepted that he had obtained new employment from 9 December 2019 and gave credit for earnings received between 9 and 19 December 2019 in the sum of £1,066.45 net. The final damages award for breach of contract was £5,418.38 net. The reasons record the claimant's monthly net pay as £2,161.31 in one place, but the damages calculation uses £2,161.61.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal declared that the respondent failed to comply with s.188 TULRA 1992 and ordered remuneration under s.189(4) TULRA 1992 for the 90-day period from 19 September 2019 to all employees made redundant on that date. The reasons do not quantify an individual sum for the claimant on this point. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to three months' notice under his Statement of Main Terms and Conditions of Employment and that there was no express PILON provision. The reasons record notice damages as three months' net pay less £1,066.45 credit for earnings from 9 to 19 December 2019. Paragraph 16 gives monthly net pay as £2,161.31, but paragraph 19 calculates the award using £2,161.61; the final damages award stated is £5,418.38. | Upheld | — | £5,418 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,418
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.188 TULRA 1992
- s.189(4) TULRA 1992
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.