Case 2304526/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Majek v Sira Care Home Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304526/2019
- Decision date
- 22 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Majek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent conceded that three sums were due to Mrs D Majek: statutory redundancy pay of £2,754, pay in lieu of 9 weeks' notice of £1,836, and pay in lieu of untaken holiday of £204. The tribunal recorded those concessions and entered judgment for each sum in the claimant's favour.
The judgment does not set out any disputed factual findings or legal analysis beyond the respondent's concession. It is a short monetary judgment only, with no separate award for interest, injury to feelings, or other tribunal remedy recorded. The total judgment sum is £4,794.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The respondent conceded that statutory redundancy pay was due, and judgment was entered for this sum. | Upheld | — | £2,754 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent conceded that pay in lieu of 9 weeks' notice was due, and judgment was entered for this sum. | Upheld | — | £1,836 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent conceded that pay in lieu of untaken holiday was due, and judgment was entered for this sum. | Upheld | — | £204 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,794
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.