Case 2304529/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Leibrick v Blue Square Marketing Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304529/2023
- Decision date
- 5 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms G Mitchell, Ms C Chaudhuri
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Leibrick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims of unfair dismissal and direct age discrimination against Blue Square Marketing Limited. The case was heard at London South on 3, 4 and 5 November 2025 before Employment Judge Heath, Ms G Mitchell and Ms C Chaudhuri.
The tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing and recorded that both claims were not well-founded and were dismissed. The written judgment does not include further factual findings, legal reasoning, or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. Written reasons were not included in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment records that the direct age discrimination claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. Written reasons were not included in the extracted text. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.