Case 2304534/2025 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs A Ashokan Mr D Paramasivan v Ganns Limited Subway — 2025

Case reference: 2304534/2025
Decision date: 2 January 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge England Representation
Venue: London South

Indexed: 17 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs A Ashokan Mr D Paramasivan

Respondent

Ganns Limited Subway

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The joined cases were listed to hear holiday pay claims. The tribunal considered a preliminary issue about whether the claims had been started in time, with agreed ACAS early conciliation dates of 15 April 2025 to 22 April 2025 and claims issued on 30 April 2025.

The tribunal found that, on either party's account, the claimants were no longer employed by the end of December 2024 at the latest. The claimants had been asking about holiday pay since October 2024, contacted Citizens Advice by mid-December 2024, raised a grievance about holiday pay, and contacted Citizens Advice again on 2 January 2025.

The tribunal concluded that it was not "not reasonably practicable" for the claimants to have issued the claims in time. The holiday pay claims were dismissed as out of time, and the tribunal stated that the decision did not reflect the merits of the claims.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Holiday pay	The tribunal dismissed the holiday pay claims as out of time and stated that the decision did not reflect the merits of the claims.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

4 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.