Case 2304538/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Simpson v Plexus Resource Solutions Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2304538/2019
- Decision date
- 19 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Simpson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the remote public hearing on 19 February 2021 before Judge Brian Doyle, the tribunal considered the claimant's application for a preparation time order against Plexus Resource Solutions Ltd. The tribunal held that the application was not well-founded and refused it.
The judgment records that the parties informed the tribunal that liability and remedy on the substantive claim were otherwise conceded, subject only to drawing up and agreeing the terms of settlement. No substantive findings on the underlying breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages, or working time issues were made in this judgment.
The tribunal directed the parties to conclude the proceedings within 28 days and to notify the tribunal accordingly. It also stated that, failing agreement, the claim would be re-listed for a final hearing of one day with standard case management orders.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This was the claimant's application for a preparation time order, not a substantive employment claim. The tribunal held it was not well-founded and refused it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.