Case 2304543/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Pinnock v Mr T Legg (deceased) and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2304543/2018
- Decision date
- 7 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster Dated
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr D Pinnock
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claims against Mr T Legg (deceased) because it determined that the legal identity of the employer was Maximus Green Ltd. It therefore treated Maximus Green Ltd as the liable respondent for the wage claim.
Maximus Green Ltd was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and was ordered to pay £2,519.20 gross. That sum was made up of £1,519.20 loss of earnings, £600 loss of commission payments, and £400 loss of benefits. The tribunal did not award anything for expenses incurred in seeking new employment because no detail had been provided for those expenses.
The tribunal also recorded that no deduction should be made in respect of holiday pay already received, because the claimant was entitled to be paid in lieu of accrued but untaken leave. The total award was therefore £2,519.20 gross.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal dismissed the claims against the first respondent, Mr T Legg (deceased), because it found that the legal identity of the employer was the second respondent, Maximus Green Ltd. The unlawful deduction from wages claim succeeded against Maximus Green Ltd. | Upheld | — | £2,519 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,519
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.