Case 2304569/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Jones v Three Cs and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2304569/2024
- Decision date
- 18 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr B Jones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal considered the Claimant's complaint that he had a right to a redundancy payment. It recorded that section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires not less than two years' service to make a redundancy payment complaint.
The Tribunal found that the Claimant was employed by the Respondent for less than two years and was therefore not entitled to bring the complaint. It also recorded that the Claimant had not given an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out. The redundancy payment complaint was struck out, and the Claimant's other complaints were not affected by the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the redundancy payment complaint was struck out because the Claimant had less than two years' service. It also states that the Claimant's other complaints were not affected by this judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.