Case 2304570/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Harris-Pugh v Net Natives Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 2304570/2024
- Decision date
- 6 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan
- Panel members
- Mr C Mardner, Mr P Adkins
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Harris-Pugh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim of automatic unfair dismissal. It upheld her claim that the respondent contravened the Equality Act 2010 in respect of pregnancy/maternity discrimination and ordered the respondent to pay total compensation of £21,780.72.
The award comprised financial loss of £9,402.62, an injury to feelings award of £10,000, and interest of £2,378.08. The financial loss was calculated from maternity pay and pension loss at the claimant's contractual rate for the first 11 weeks of maternity leave (£13,495.88) and at an alternative role's rate for the remainder (£8,996.11), less statutory maternity pay actually paid (£12,441.84), plus 18 days of accrued holiday paid at the alternative role's day rate (£2,486.70), giving a sub-total of £12,536.85. That sub-total was then reduced by 25% to reflect the chance the claimant would have turned down the alternative role and would have been dismissed in any event, even without the contravention of the Equality Act.
Interest was calculated as simple interest at 8% (£2.19 per day): £1,584.66 on the injury to feelings award (723 days from 14 February 2024, the date of discrimination, to 6 February 2026) and £793.42 on the financial losses (362 days from the midpoint of that period to 6 February 2026). The hearing was conducted by video at London South on 2-6 February 2026 before Employment Judge Corrigan sitting with Mr C Mardner and Mr P Adkins.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Pleaded as automatic unfair dismissal; the Tribunal dismissed this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Tribunal found the respondent contravened the Equality Act 2010 in respect of pregnancy/maternity discrimination. Financial loss component reduced by 25% to reflect the chance the claimant would have turned down the alternative role and been dismissed in any event. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £21,781 |
| Unfair dismissal | Pleaded as automatic unfair dismissal; the Tribunal dismissed this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Tribunal found the respondent contravened the Equality Act 2010 in respect of pregnancy/maternity discrimination. Financial loss component reduced by 25% to reflect the chance the claimant would have turned down the alternative role and been dismissed in any event. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £21,781 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,781
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £9,403
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.