Case 2304577/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Baljit Singh v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis — 2026
- Case reference
- 2304577/2024
- Decision date
- 12 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Baljit Singh
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at London South by video on 10, 11 and 12 February 2026 before Employment Judge C H O'Rourke. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The written judgment records that the claimant's claims of unfair dismissal and direct discrimination failed and were dismissed. The judgment states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The short written judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. Oral reasons were given and written reasons were not included in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the direct discrimination claim failed and was dismissed. The gov.uk listing category identifies the discrimination claim as disability discrimination, but the short judgment text itself does not restate the protected characteristic. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.