Case 2304588/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Wasko v Sentimental Care Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304588/2018
- Decision date
- 25 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Havard
- Venue
- Aberystwyth
- Panel members
- Ms C Peel, Mr B Roberts
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Wasko
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Aberystwyth before Employment Judge R Havard with Ms C Peel and Mr B Roberts, heard the claim on 16, 17 and 18 March 2020. It held unanimously that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claimant's claims because of the applicable statutory time limits.
In any event, the tribunal dismissed the claimant's disability discrimination claim and her indirect sex discrimination claim. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no fuller written reasons or remedy findings are set out in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claim because of the applicable statutory time limits. In any event, the disability discrimination claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claim because of the applicable statutory time limits. In any event, the indirect sex discrimination claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.