Case 2304596/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Summers (deceased) v Battersea Labour Club and Institute Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304596/2024
- Decision date
- 11 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Yardley Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Summers (deceased)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 28 May 2024. The Respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and its application for an extension of time to file the ET3 was refused. The tribunal was satisfied that it could determine the claim, or part of it, under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024.
The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was found well-founded. The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £637.78, calculated using net pay so as to reflect that any tax or National Insurance due had already been paid.
The complaint in respect of holiday pay was also found well-founded. The tribunal held that the Respondent had been in breach of contract in failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when the Claimant’s employment ended, and ordered payment of £1,932.00.
The claim relating to pension contributions was dismissed because the Employment Tribunal had no jurisdiction to determine it. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal rules.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded and awarded £637.78, calculated on a net basis. | Upheld | — | £638 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well-founded, describing it as a breach of contract for failure to pay for holidays accrued but untaken when employment ended. | Upheld | — | £1,932 |
| Other | The claim relating to pension contributions was dismissed because the Employment Tribunal had no jurisdiction to determine it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,570
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.