Case 2304607/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Tchameni v Pathway For Care — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304607/2021
- Decision date
- 24 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Members
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms C Oldfield, Ms A Rodney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Tchameni
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting at London South on 22-24 February 2023 before Employment Judge Ferguson with lay members Ms C Oldfield and Ms A Rodney, gave a unanimous judgment in Mr P Tchameni's case against Pathway for Care Ltd. The judgment records that the complaint of detriment because of protected disclosures failed and was dismissed.
The Tribunal also dismissed the complaint of automatic unfair dismissal on the basis of protected disclosures. No separate remedy figure or award is recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Complaint of detriment because of protected disclosures; dismissed by unanimous judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Complaint of automatic unfair dismissal (protected disclosures); dismissed by unanimous judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.