Case 2304612/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Victoria Gillham v EVG Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2304612/2018
- Decision date
- 15 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Victoria Gillham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant had been employed for 6.5 years. The judgment records that Elite Venue Centre Ltd was sold to EVG Ltd on 1 October 2018 by way of a TUPE transfer, so EVG Ltd stood in the shoes of the transferor for sums due before the transfer. Elite Venue Centre Ltd was therefore discharged as a respondent. EVG Ltd had been served at its registered office but did not present a response, and the Tribunal proceeded on the basis of an undefended claim.
The Tribunal accepted the Claimant's evidence and documentary bundle, including payslips showing that she had been paid £2,777 per month. It found that on 5 November 2018 she was told she was suspended and to collect her belongings, and that she then heard nothing further and did not receive a P45, P60, or other documentation. The Tribunal was satisfied that she had in fact been dismissed on that date despite the word "suspension" being used.
The dismissal was found to be unfair because there had been no disciplinary hearing in accordance with the ACAS code of practice. The Tribunal also accepted that the Claimant had taken reasonable steps to mitigate her loss and noted her evidence that she had made many unsuccessful applications for work because she lacked a reference for her previous employment. It awarded a basic award of £3,084.00 and a compensatory award of £24,300.00.
The Tribunal additionally upheld the Claimant's holiday pay and wage deduction claims. It found that she had worked for four years without holiday as the only manager, but could only claim for two years, and awarded £6,925.00 for two years' holiday at her net pay. It also found that Elite Venue Centre Ltd had underpaid her by £77.00 before the transfer, for which EVG Ltd was liable. The total amount due was £34,386.00.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Tribunal found the Claimant was dismissed on 5 November 2018 and that the dismissal was unfair because there was no disciplinary hearing in accordance with the ACAS code of practice. Basic award £3,084.00 and compensatory award £24,300.00. | Upheld | — | £27,384 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday on termination succeeded. Tribunal found the Claimant was entitled to 28 days statutory holiday per year, could only claim for two years, and awarded £6,925.00 representing two years' holiday at net pay. | Upheld | — | £6,925 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for an underpayment before the TUPE transfer succeeded. Tribunal found Elite Venue Centre Ltd underpaid the Claimant by £77.00 prior to the transfer and held EVG Ltd liable for that sum. | Upheld | — | £77 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £34,386
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,084
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £24,300
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- ACAS code of practice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.