Case 2304623/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Wellman v Construction Contractors Incorporated Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304623/2020
- Decision date
- 14 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mason
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Wellman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Mason. The claimant, Mr. Wellman, succeeded on a breach of contract claim relating to notice. The tribunal found that he was dismissed in breach of contract and ordered the respondent, Construction Contractors Incorporated Ltd, to pay damages of £4,550 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis, it held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £12,587.50. The judgment does not set out any further reasoning, tests, or separate remedy apportionment beyond those two awards.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £4,550 gross. | Upheld | — | £4,550 |
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £12,587.50. | Upheld | — | £12,588 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,138
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.