Case 2304645/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Pop v St George’s University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304645/2018
- Decision date
- 15 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Pop
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr I Pop brought claims of race discrimination and holiday pay arising from his employment as a staff nurse from 4 January 2016 to 30 September 2018. The race complaint concerned the Respondent's investigation into a drug error in July 2017, an informal warning issued on 28 August 2017, and the warning being said to be 'hanging over' him. The tribunal treated the complaint as founded only on those 2017 acts; it rejected the argument that the continuing consequences of the warning were themselves a continuing act, and it held that later drug errors in September 2018 were at most further evidence, not fresh acts of discrimination.
Applying section 123 of the Equality Act 2010, the tribunal held that the race discrimination claim was presented substantially out of time. It found no reason to extend time on a just and equitable basis, noting that the claimant accepted he could have brought the complaint in 2017 and had given no reason for the delay. The tribunal therefore dismissed the race discrimination complaint.
On holiday pay, the tribunal recorded that the Respondent had already made substantial payments, including sums of £2,156.40 and £1,826.88, but the claimant had not identified any remaining balance or quantified what he said was still owed. Because he had failed to comply with two tribunal orders to clarify the complaint and had not actively pursued it, the tribunal struck out the holiday pay claim under Rule 37. No tribunal monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Dismissed because the tribunal found the complaint was substantially out of time and that there was no basis to extend time on a just and equitable basis. The tribunal held that the only alleged discriminatory acts were the July 2017 investigation and the 28 August 2017 informal warning, and that the continuing effect of the warning was not a continuing act. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Holiday pay | Struck out under Rule 37 for non-compliance with two tribunal orders and/or failure to actively pursue the complaint. The tribunal noted that the respondent had already made substantial holiday pay payments, and the claimant had not identified or quantified any sum still outstanding. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- continuing act under s.123(3)
- just and equitable extension of time
- Hendricks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
- Lyfar v Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals Trust
- Southwark London Borough v Alfolabi
- Rule 37 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.