Case 2304653/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Crawford v Mrs G Obamwonyi — 2021
- Case reference
- 2304653/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keogh Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Crawford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Crawford did not attend the hearing and gave no reason for her absence. The tribunal recorded that the claim did not appear to be actively pursued. It described the pleaded matter as one about payslips for the period of employment from 17 July 2018 to 8 September 2019, but noted that section 11(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is concerned with a reference to determine what ought to have been set out in an itemised pay statement, not a standalone claim simply for statements to be provided. The tribunal also noted that the claimant had not sought a determination of what should have been included in the payslips.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim described as a request for payslips/itemised pay statements for the period 17 July 2018 to 8 September 2019, together with complaints about a refusal to complete an SMP1 form and incorrect dates given to HMRC. The tribunal held there was no disclosable cause of action in law and no jurisdiction to hear the SMP1/HMRC complaints. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.11(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.8 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.