Mr Adrian Kisakye v B&Q Limited — 2023

Case reference: 2304653/2023
Decision date: 12 December 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Fowell JUDGMENT

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr Adrian Kisakye

Respondent

B&Q Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the claimant confirmed the relevant dates. On that basis, the tribunal found that he did not have the necessary two years' service at the date of dismissal to bring an unfair dismissal claim.

The claim of unfair dismissal was dismissed. The judgment stated that this order concluded the proceedings.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The claim was dismissed because the claimant did not have the necessary two years' service at the date of dismissal to bring an unfair dismissal claim.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.