Case 2304660/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Howard v Burkinshaw Management Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304660/2019
- Decision date
- 18 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Ashford
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Howard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing in Ashford on 18 March 2020, Employment Judge Corrigan, sitting alone, recorded by consent that the correct respondent was Burkinshaw Management Limited, that Mrs P Howard had been an employee, and that there had been a relevant transfer to the respondent. The tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to consider her complaints and refused to strike out the claim or order a deposit.
The tribunal found that Mrs P Howard was wrongfully dismissed and awarded £422.03, made up of £337.62 loss of earnings plus a 25% uplift for breach of the ACAS Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance. It also found that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,625.58 and ordered payment of £2,031.98 after the same 25% uplift.
The claimant's TUPE complaint, that the respondent failed to inform and consult employees affected by the transfer, was found well-founded and compensation of £1,280.76 was ordered. The tribunal also found that she was unfairly dismissed, but made no separate award on that finding. The total ordered to be paid by the respondent was £3,734.77.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Award comprised £337.62 loss of earnings plus a 25% uplift for breach of the ACAS Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance. | Upheld | — | £422 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal said the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,625.58 and ordered £2,031.98 after a 25% uplift for breach of the ACAS Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance. | Upheld | — | £2,032 |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The claimant's complaint that the respondent failed to inform and consult employees affected by the transfer was held to be well-founded. | Upheld | — | £1,281 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found unfair dismissal but made no separate award. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,735
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.