Case 2304682/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P von Roggenhausen v Abellio London Ltd Heard by Cloud Video Platform — 2021
- Case reference
- 2304682/2019
- Decision date
- 27 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P von Roggenhausen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting before Employment Judge Reed, heard the case on 13 to 14 October 2020 by Cloud Video Platform with the claimant in person and the respondent represented by counsel. The written judgment records a single outcome: the claimant was not unfairly dismissed.
The document does not set out the tribunal's reasoning in writing. It states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties. On the face of the written record, no monetary remedy was awarded because the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states only that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided in the record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.