Case 2304685/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Canameti v Prime Hotels Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2304685/2021
- Decision date
- 9 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Truscott KC
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Canameti
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr E Canameti was employed by Prime Hotels Limited as a part-time bar employee from 15 July 2018 to 31 August 2021. During the Covid-19 shutdown he was placed in the furlough scheme. The judgment records that he was underpaid wages, but when the bar lease was transferred the respondent agreed the sums due to him and others, and in his case the figure was £5,316.68.
The reasons state that the claimant was paid that amount in two cheques of £2,658.34. The tribunal also noted that on 16 November 2021 Employment Judge Abbott had made standard orders, which the claimant did not comply with, and in particular he did not inform the tribunal of any sum still due to him.
On that basis, the tribunal concluded that there was no sum due to the claimant in respect of his wages and that he did not seek to pursue any other claim. The claim was therefore dismissed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found there was no sum due to the claimant in respect of wages. The judgment also records that he did not seek to pursue any other claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.