Case 2304686/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F. Dargle v International House World Organisation Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2304686/2021
- Decision date
- 8 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R. Smith
- Venue
- London South in private
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F. Dargle
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was listed for hearing by CVP on 18 October 2022 before Employment Judge T.R. Smith. Neither the claimant nor the respondent attended. The tribunal recorded that telephone calls and emails were sent to both parties that morning, that no reply was received, and that a notice of hearing had been sent on 8 June 2022. It also noted that an email sent the previous day converting the matter to CVP was returned to the respondent.
Having regard to the non-attendance of both parties and the contents of the claim form and response, the tribunal decided under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitutional Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 to dismiss the claimant's claim. The judgment records no findings on the merits of the underlying claims and makes no monetary award. The parties were directed to rule 70, which allows an application for reconsideration where it is in the interests of justice.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Dismissed under rule 47 when neither party attended; the tribunal did not determine the merits of the underlying claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Dismissed under rule 47 when neither party attended; the tribunal did not determine the merits of the underlying claim. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under rule 47 when neither party attended; the tribunal did not determine the merits of the underlying claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under rule 47 when neither party attended; the tribunal did not determine the merits of the underlying claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed under rule 47 when neither party attended; the tribunal did not determine the merits of the underlying claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 47
- rule 70 Employment Tribunal (Constitutional Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.