Case 2304692/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Ibrahim v The Agile Rabbit Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304692/2021
- Decision date
- 22 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Perry Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Ibrahim
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the further Preliminary Hearing on 17 February 2023, the Claimant did not attend. The Tribunal clerk attempted to call him several times and reached him, but he disconnected when told the call was from the Employment Tribunal. The Respondent did not know why he had not attended.
Employment Judge T Perry noted that a Preliminary Hearing had already taken place before EJ L Clarke on 20 December 2022, at which the Claimant had also failed to attend by CVP. The judge recorded that the hearing notice had been sent to the email address the Claimant had provided on his claim form, and that no witness statement had been filed despite one having been ordered. After considering Rule 47 and making all practicable enquiries into the non-attendance, the Tribunal decided it was in the interests of justice to dismiss the claims.
The judgment records that dismissal would in any event have followed because, in the Claimant's absence, he could not discharge the burden on him when seeking extensions of time to bring his claims. No merits findings were made on the underlying whistleblowing, race, religion or belief, sex discrimination, or unfair dismissal allegations.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Dismissed under Rule 47 for failure to attend or be represented at the Preliminary Hearing; no merits determination was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed under Rule 47 for failure to attend or be represented at the Preliminary Hearing; no merits determination was made. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Dismissed under Rule 47 for failure to attend or be represented at the Preliminary Hearing; no merits determination was made. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Sex discrimination | Dismissed under Rule 47 for failure to attend or be represented at the Preliminary Hearing; no merits determination was made. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under Rule 47 for failure to attend or be represented at the Preliminary Hearing; no merits determination was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.