Case 2304695/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Jalloh v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2304695/2019
- Decision date
- 20 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Braganza Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Jalloh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was summarily dismissed after allegations concerning misuse of her Tesco Clubcard. The tribunal found that the reason for dismissal was conduct, not redundancy, and accepted that the respondent had a genuine belief, on reasonable grounds, that the claimant had committed misconduct.
The tribunal found the dismissal unfair. It held that the respondent failed to make enquiries of colleagues who were involved in the transactions, particularly the claimant's line manager, who scanned the card in the transaction relied on at appeal and received a warning. The tribunal considered that the claimant's long unblemished service, repeated apologies, expressed remorse, explanation that she misunderstood the rules, the low value involved, and the involvement of other staff were material circumstances.
The tribunal found the decision to dismiss was both procedurally and substantively outside the band of reasonable responses. It made no Polkey deduction because it could not predict that dismissal would have occurred had a fair procedure been followed, but found the claimant had contributed to her dismissal and ordered a 10% reduction to the basic and compensatory awards.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim and ordered a remedy hearing. It found a 10% deduction should apply to both the basic and compensatory awards for contributory conduct. No monetary remedy was determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- British Home Stores Ltd v Burchell [1980] ICR 303
- Foley v Post Office [2000] ICR 1283
- Boys and Girls Welfare Society v McDonald [1997] ICR 693
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones [1982] IRLR 439
- Sainsburys Supermarket Ltd v Hitt [2003] IRLR 23 CA
- Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd [1987] IRLR 503
- Software 2000 Ltd v Andrews [2007] IRLR 568
- sections 122(2) and 123(6) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.