Case 2304705/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M. Kaczmarek v Victory Cleaning Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2304705/2021
- Decision date
- 4 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Carney Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M. Kaczmarek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs M. Kaczmarek brought a complaint against Victory Cleaning Ltd for unlawful deduction from wages. On 4 August 2022, Employment Judge Carney found that complaint well founded and recorded that the claimant's claim succeeded. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £847.17 gross, subject to any applicable deductions for tax and national insurance contributions. No other claims, legal tests, or additional remedy components are identified in the written judgment record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was well founded and ordered payment of £847.17 gross, subject to any applicable tax and national insurance deductions. | Upheld | — | £847 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £847
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.