Case 2304721/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Buhlman, Claimant’s friend/Lay representative For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 2304721/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harrington
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr S Buhlman, Claimant’s friend/Lay representative For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Harrington, sitting alone in London South, determined the unfair dismissal claim brought by Mr P Stevens against Newhaven Port and Properties Limited. The judgment states that the claimant was unfairly dismissed.
The tribunal also found that the claimant caused or contributed to his own dismissal, and assessed that contribution at 100%. The extracted text does not set out any separate monetary award, and no remedy figures are recorded in the written decision extract provided. The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. It also found that the claimant caused or contributed to his own dismissal, with contribution assessed at 100%. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.