Case 2304734/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Robin Tandon v Adarga Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304734/2025
- Decision date
- 28 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lumby JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Robin Tandon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Croydon, sitting in chambers on 28 November 2025, Employment Judge Lumby recorded that, except for the complaint relating to loss in pension value by reason of late payment of contributions, the claimant’s complaints were dismissed on withdrawal. The stated reason was that the amounts withheld had by then been paid.
The written judgment also states that the claimant’s complaint relating to loss in pension value by reason of late payment of contributions remains. The extracted text does not record a final determination of that complaint or any remedy figure for it.
No legal tests are mentioned in the extracted judgment, and the decision is a short disposal order rather than a substantive reasons judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify each withdrawn complaint separately. It states that, apart from the complaint about loss in pension value by reason of late payment of contributions, the claimant’s complaints were dismissed on withdrawal because the amounts withheld had now been paid. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.