Case 2304747/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Carralero Trigo v Jump Up Logistics Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2304747/2020
- Decision date
- 25 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Carralero Trigo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 25 August 2020. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge decided the claim could properly be determined under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The judgment ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,820 gross.
The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for any figures owed to HMRC in respect of tax or national insurance contributions. The bottom-line amount payable by the respondent was £1,820 in total.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,820 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,820 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,820
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.