Case 2304768/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Donachy v Mitchells and Butlers — 2022
- Case reference
- 2304768/2021
- Decision date
- 21 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Donachy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr M Donachy's claim against Mitchells and Butlers. It recorded that by letter dated 01 July 2022 the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 25 February 2022 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Wright ordered that the claim be struck out on 21 September 2022. No liability findings or remedy award were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal struck out the claim after a letter dated 01 July 2022 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about strike out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 25 February 2022 and because the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.