Case 2304771/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Robbins (Director) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2304771/2020
- Decision date
- 30 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster Appearances
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 30 September 2021 at London South Employment Tribunal, Employment Judge Webster heard Mr K Lasetta's claims against Premium Coaches Ltd. Mr Robbins, the director, appeared for the respondent. The tribunal considered claims concerning unpaid holiday pay and unpaid wages, pleaded as unauthorised deduction from wages and/or breach of contract.
The tribunal did not uphold either claim. It rejected the claim in respect of unpaid holiday pay and also rejected the claim in respect of unpaid wages. No remedy or monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim in respect of unpaid holiday pay, pleaded as unauthorised deduction from wages and/or breach of contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim in respect of unpaid wages, pleaded as unauthorised deduction from wages and/or breach of contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.