Case 2304788/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Doswell v Eastbourne U10 Fishermens CIC — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304788/2022
- Decision date
- 18 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Doswell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment on the unfair dismissal complaint only. The tribunal recorded that by letter dated 22/03/2023 it gave Miss L Doswell an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out, because she had not been employed for two years.
The claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal under rule 37.
The judgment states that the claimant's remaining claim(s) remained listed for hearing on 18 September 2023 and on 16-19 July 2024. No remedy was assessed in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under rule 37 after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 22/03/2023 to make representations or request a hearing on the point that she had not been employed for two years. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.