Case 2304789/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Amy Relph v Ms Ashleigh Gotz — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304789/2022
- Decision date
- 29 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dyal Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Amy Relph
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Amy Relph brought a claim against Ms Ashleigh Gotz arising from unpaid notice pay. The case was heard at London South Employment Tribunal by videolink on 29 June 2023 before Employment Judge Dyal, with the respondent not attending and not represented. The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant a week's notice pay to which she was entitled.
The sole substantive outcome recorded in the judgment was that the respondent must pay the claimant the gross sum of £323. The judgment does not record any other claim type, any separate remedy breakdown, or any additional findings beyond the entitlement to one week's notice pay.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay a week's notice pay to which the claimant was entitled and ordered payment of the gross sum of £323. | Upheld | — | £323 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £323
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.