Case 2304795/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Catlin v All Electrical Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304795/2022
- Decision date
- 3 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Catlin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 15 December 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Andrews determined that the claim could properly be decided under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that Mr S Catlin was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. It calculated the award by reference to an effective date of termination of 30 November 2022, his age of 66, nine complete years of service, a multiplier of 1.5 weeks for each year of service aged over 22 to 41, and gross weekly pay at the statutory maximum of £571.00.
The tribunal ordered All Electrical Ltd to pay Mr Catlin £2,087.10 in total. The hearing listed for 17 May 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 21 determination made because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £2,087 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,087
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.