Case 2304797/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Linda Turner First v St Catherine’s Catholic School Second Respondent: Marie Foucher Third Respondent: Nicola Thompson Fourth Respondent: Lois Addo — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304797/2024
- Decision date
- 23 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lumby REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Linda Turner First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in public on 23 July 2025 before Employment Judge Lumby, the tribunal determined whether the claimant was a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 Equality Act 2010. It found that, at the relevant times, she was disabled because of back problems/spinal arthritis. It also found that from 5 November 2022 she was disabled because of a prolapsed bladder, and from 1 November 2023 she was disabled because of a combination of stress, anxiety, depression, unstable angina and high blood pressure.
The tribunal stated that any relevant complaints relating to those disabilities and falling within the relevant time periods could proceed, but that complaints falling outside those time periods were dismissed. It further found that the claimant was not a disabled person as defined by section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of learning disabilities, and complaints relating to learning disabilities were therefore dismissed. No monetary award was made in this preliminary judgment, and written reasons were not provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held that the claimant was a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of back problems/spinal arthritis, from 5 November 2022 because of a prolapsed bladder, and from 1 November 2023 because of a combination of stress, anxiety, depression, unstable angina and high blood pressure. Relevant complaints within those periods could proceed. Complaints outside the relevant time periods were dismissed, and complaints relating to learning disabilities were dismissed. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.