Case 2304805/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A. Plummer v East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2304805/2021
- Decision date
- 10 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R.Smith Representation
- Venue
- London South in private
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A. Plummer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South in private by CVP on 10 October 2022 before Employment Judge T.R. Smith. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor.
The only recorded complaint in the written judgment was the claimant's allegation that he made a protected disclosure or disclosures. That complaint was dismissed on withdrawal, so the tribunal did not make a substantive determination on the merits of the whistleblowing allegation.
The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No award or remedy was recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the claimant's complaint that he made a protected disclosure or disclosures was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.