Case 2304815/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Adam Collett v London Security Automation Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2304815/2020
- Decision date
- 12 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Adam Collett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment on a preliminary issue only, heard at Croydon by video on 11 and 12 July 2022 before Employment Judge Fowell. The tribunal held that Mr Adam Collett was at all material times both an employee and a worker of London Security Automation Limited.
The judgment did not determine the substantive tribunal claims. Instead, it recorded that Mr Collett's claim and the respondent's contract claim would be determined at a further hearing. The tribunal then made case management orders about an updated schedule of loss, further remedy documents, a further bundle, and updated witness statements for the next hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal held that Mr Collett was at all material times both an employee and a worker of the respondent. The claimant's claim and the employer's contract claim were listed for a further hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.