Case 2304816/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Rianna Nelson v Shapers (Sutton) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304816/2022
- Decision date
- 12 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Rianna Nelson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Fowell entered judgment for Miss Rianna Nelson under Rule 21 because Shapers (Sydenham) Limited failed to respond to the claim form. The order records that judgment was entered for the claimant without setting out the merits of the underlying claims in the text provided.
The tribunal directed that compensation would be assessed at a separate remedy hearing listed for 10.00 am on 10 August 2023. The respondent was to be notified of that hearing but would only be permitted to participate to the extent allowed by the Employment Judge.
No liability reasoning, legal tests, or split compensation figures are recorded in the extracted text. The judgment is therefore a default judgment on liability only, with the monetary award left outstanding for later assessment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment entered for the claimant because the respondent failed to respond to the claim form. The judgment text does not specify the individual claim heads in the body of the order. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the .
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.