Case 2304823/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Shobah Steel v Lewisham & Greenwich NHS Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2304823/2020
- Decision date
- 23 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Members
- Venue
- London South Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Ms N Styles, Ms J Saunders
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Shobah Steel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously decided that the respondent did not contravene section 13 of the Equality Act 2010. The claimant's claim for direct race discrimination therefore did not succeed.
The tribunal also unanimously decided that the respondent did not contravene sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010. The claimant's claim of failure to make reasonable adjustments therefore did not succeed. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim for direct race discrimination did not succeed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim of failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010 did not succeed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s13 Equality Act 2010
- s20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.