Case 2304824/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Jack Pearce v National Business Communications Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2304824/2019
- Decision date
- 27 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Apted Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jack Pearce
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case remotely by CVP on 27 May 2021 before Employment Judge Apted. The respondent did not attend and was not represented. The written record states that the hearing was remote because a face-to-face hearing was not practicable due to the Covid-19 virus.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages. No separate written reasons were provided in the judgment record, but the decision records that the claim was well founded.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a gross sum of £623.08. That amount was broken down in the judgment as £346.15 for a week's notice pay, £242.31 for 3.6 days accrued but untaken holiday pay, and £34.62 for one half day's pay for 5 July 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was well founded. The ordered gross sum was itemised as one week's notice pay of £346.15, 3.6 days accrued but untaken holiday pay of £242.31, and one half day's pay for 5 July 2019 of £34.62. | Upheld | — | £623 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £623
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.